<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (11) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28929</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of indirect expenses related to agricultural activities, disallowance of land revenue as direct expenditure, and the finding that various agricultural activities constituted an indivisible business. The court clarified the interpretation of Rule 8 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, emphasizing that similar activities should be treated as one business entity for computing income tax liabilities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:57:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67926" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (11) TMI 17 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28929</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the disallowance of indirect expenses related to agricultural activities, disallowance of land revenue as direct expenditure, and the finding that various agricultural activities constituted an indivisible business. The court clarified the interpretation of Rule 8 of the Income-tax Rules, 1962, emphasizing that similar activities should be treated as one business entity for computing income tax liabilities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28929</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>