<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 729 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable. The penalty was deemed invalid due to the absence of a specific charge in the show-cause notice and the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief in disclosing income. The Tribunal found no intention to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, ultimately deleting the penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:42:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679254" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 729 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, concluding that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not sustainable. The penalty was deemed invalid due to the absence of a specific charge in the show-cause notice and the assessee&#039;s bona fide belief in disclosing income. The Tribunal found no intention to conceal income or furnish inaccurate particulars, ultimately deleting the penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>