<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 725 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422465</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses constituted an international transaction. It upheld the findings of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) on this issue. However, the Tribunal directed the TPO to reevaluate the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of AMP expenses using appropriate methods and comparables. The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were deemed premature and dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 12:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 725 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422465</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the Advertisement, Marketing, and Promotion (AMP) expenses constituted an international transaction. It upheld the findings of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) on this issue. However, the Tribunal directed the TPO to reevaluate the Arm&#039;s Length Price (ALP) of AMP expenses using appropriate methods and comparables. The penalty proceedings under Section 271(1)(c) were deemed premature and dismissed. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>