<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 716 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422456</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal found a pre-existing dispute over the GST payment, supported by communications and criminal complaints. Consequently, the Application was rejected, the deposited amount was to be returned, and each party was responsible for their costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:42:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 716 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422456</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal set aside the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s decision to admit the Section 9 Application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The Tribunal found a pre-existing dispute over the GST payment, supported by communications and criminal complaints. Consequently, the Application was rejected, the deposited amount was to be returned, and each party was responsible for their costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>