https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422453 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical company in SEZ, against the partial rejection of refund claims and denial of interest. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to refunds for services received for authorized operations, even if not specified by the Approval Committee, based on previous decisions and legal provisions. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant's right to interest on delayed refund payments under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, affirming their entitlement to both refunds and interest. en-us Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422453 The Tribunal allowed the appeals in favor of the appellant, a pharmaceutical company in SEZ, against the partial rejection of refund claims and denial of interest. The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to refunds for services received for authorized operations, even if not specified by the Approval Committee, based on previous decisions and legal provisions. The Tribunal also ruled in favor of the appellant's right to interest on delayed refund payments under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act, affirming their entitlement to both refunds and interest. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422453