https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422449 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving demands of excise duty and cenvat credit on goods used for job work within the factory premises. It was held that the goods were not liable for confiscation as they were legitimately used for manufacturing, and no duty was payable on them. The department's allegations of clearing fresh goods disguised as old were unsubstantiated, and the demand for duty on such basis was deemed unsustainable. The denial of Cenvat credit on coal stored outside the factory premises was also rejected. The Tribunal emphasized transparent transactions and compliance with regulations, setting aside the demands and confiscation. en-us Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422449 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant in a case involving demands of excise duty and cenvat credit on goods used for job work within the factory premises. It was held that the goods were not liable for confiscation as they were legitimately used for manufacturing, and no duty was payable on them. The department's allegations of clearing fresh goods disguised as old were unsubstantiated, and the demand for duty on such basis was deemed unsustainable. The denial of Cenvat credit on coal stored outside the factory premises was also rejected. The Tribunal emphasized transparent transactions and compliance with regulations, setting aside the demands and confiscation. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422449