<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 707 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422447</link>
    <description>The revised value of the nitrogen component in DAP was held to take effect from 29 January 1999, when the Union Government enhanced the DAP rate, rather than from 26 February 2000 when the State Trade Tax authorities circulated the revised value. The applicable notification tied fertilizer component values to Agriculture Department guidelines from time to time, and the Court treated the dispute as one about the value of the taxable component, not a change in tax rate. As the record showed that the enhanced DAP rate had been recovered from 1999 onwards and no material displaced the concurrent factual findings, the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 707 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422447</link>
      <description>The revised value of the nitrogen component in DAP was held to take effect from 29 January 1999, when the Union Government enhanced the DAP rate, rather than from 26 February 2000 when the State Trade Tax authorities circulated the revised value. The applicable notification tied fertilizer component values to Agriculture Department guidelines from time to time, and the Court treated the dispute as one about the value of the taxable component, not a change in tax rate. As the record showed that the enhanced DAP rate had been recovered from 1999 onwards and no material displaced the concurrent factual findings, the issue was decided in favour of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422447</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>