https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422444 The SC held that when an appeal is permitted to be withdrawn, the court cannot in the same order continue ex parte interim protection, reduce costs, or issue directions that effectively dilute an earlier dismissal on merits. Here, the writ petition had already been dismissed after consideration of the borrower's conduct and the SARFAESI recovery proceedings, so the later appellate directions impermissibly granted indirect relief and neutralised those findings. The Court set aside the protective and diluting directions, vacated the earlier interim order, and left the withdrawal of the appeal undisturbed, while also imposing costs. en-us Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422444 The SC held that when an appeal is permitted to be withdrawn, the court cannot in the same order continue ex parte interim protection, reduce costs, or issue directions that effectively dilute an earlier dismissal on merits. Here, the writ petition had already been dismissed after consideration of the borrower's conduct and the SARFAESI recovery proceedings, so the later appellate directions impermissibly granted indirect relief and neutralised those findings. The Court set aside the protective and diluting directions, vacated the earlier interim order, and left the withdrawal of the appeal undisturbed, while also imposing costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422444