<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422443</link>
    <description>A valid reference to arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 requires a clear written agreement of all interested parties to submit the dispute, or part of it, to arbitration. An application seeking only appointment of a chartered accountant to examine accounts and report to the court did not amount to such consent, and the court retained control of the suit. The chartered accountant acted as a commissioner or expert in aid of the court, not as an arbitral tribunal deciding rights bindingly. The report was therefore a commissioner&#039;s report, not an arbitral award, and the suit was to proceed on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 May 2022 21:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679220" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 703 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422443</link>
      <description>A valid reference to arbitration under Section 21 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 requires a clear written agreement of all interested parties to submit the dispute, or part of it, to arbitration. An application seeking only appointment of a chartered accountant to examine accounts and report to the court did not amount to such consent, and the court retained control of the suit. The chartered accountant acted as a commissioner or expert in aid of the court, not as an arbitral tribunal deciding rights bindingly. The report was therefore a commissioner&#039;s report, not an arbitral award, and the suit was to proceed on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>