<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Rules Section 148 of NI Act Applies Retrospectively; 20% Deposit Requirement Upheld in Cheque Dishonor Cases.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63480</link>
    <description>Dishonor of Cheque - requirement of deposit 20% of the amount of fine or compensation - scope of amendment to section 148 of NI Act - retrospective or prospective - In case of Section 148 of the NI Act, there is no substantive right that is being taken away by the enforcement of the amendment - the argument that Section 148 is not retrospective is rejected. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:16 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Rules Section 148 of NI Act Applies Retrospectively; 20% Deposit Requirement Upheld in Cheque Dishonor Cases.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63480</link>
      <description>Dishonor of Cheque - requirement of deposit 20% of the amount of fine or compensation - scope of amendment to section 148 of NI Act - retrospective or prospective - In case of Section 148 of the NI Act, there is no substantive right that is being taken away by the enforcement of the amendment - the argument that Section 148 is not retrospective is rejected. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2022 08:41:16 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>