https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302310 The Tribunal held in favor of the Applicant, quashing the notice dated 08.11.2019 and restraining the Respondent from taking any coercive steps during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, prohibiting the termination of the lease agreement and recovery of property occupied by the Corporate Debtor. Additionally, the Tribunal asserted its jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) of the Code to decide on matters related to insolvency resolution, overriding any conflicting laws. en-us Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 15 May 2022 21:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302310 The Tribunal held in favor of the Applicant, quashing the notice dated 08.11.2019 and restraining the Respondent from taking any coercive steps during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of Section 14(1)(d) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, prohibiting the termination of the lease agreement and recovery of property occupied by the Corporate Debtor. Additionally, the Tribunal asserted its jurisdiction under Section 60(5)(c) of the Code to decide on matters related to insolvency resolution, overriding any conflicting laws. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Mon, 12 Apr 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302310