<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 690 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422430</link>
    <description>The Court allowed the Writ appeal in part, setting aside the order denying the benefit of Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act to the appellant due to a delay in investing in specified bonds. The Court emphasized an expedited reconsideration by the first respondent, highlighting that the appellant should not suffer due to technical grounds and leaving all rights and contentions open for the parties involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 690 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422430</link>
      <description>The Court allowed the Writ appeal in part, setting aside the order denying the benefit of Section 54EC of the Income Tax Act to the appellant due to a delay in investing in specified bonds. The Court emphasized an expedited reconsideration by the first respondent, highlighting that the appellant should not suffer due to technical grounds and leaving all rights and contentions open for the parties involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>