<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 686 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422426</link>
    <description>The appeal by the Assessee trust against the rejection of registration under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act by the Ld. CIT(E) was successful. The ITAT set aside the rejection, directing the grant of registration to the trust. The decision highlighted the significance of adhering to judicial directions, specifically referencing a prior ITAT order in favor of the Assessee trust. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of considering previous judicial directives in similar cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 08:39:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 686 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422426</link>
      <description>The appeal by the Assessee trust against the rejection of registration under section 80G(5) of the Income Tax Act by the Ld. CIT(E) was successful. The ITAT set aside the rejection, directing the grant of registration to the trust. The decision highlighted the significance of adhering to judicial directions, specifically referencing a prior ITAT order in favor of the Assessee trust. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the importance of considering previous judicial directives in similar cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>