<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 681 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted appeals delayed by the pandemic for adjudication. Disallowance of depreciation on intellectual property rights for 2007-08 was overturned due to evidence. The disallowance for 2008-09 was upheld as license renewal proof was lacking. Disallowance of unsecured loan was deleted as ledger entry proved loan receipt. Disallowance of loan amount credited to account was deleted based on provided evidence. Disallowance under section 43B was dismissed. The appeal for 2007-08 was allowed, while for 2008-09, it was partly allowed due to lack of renewal evidence. The Tribunal made decisions based on presented evidence and lower authorities&#039; findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 21:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679158" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 681 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted appeals delayed by the pandemic for adjudication. Disallowance of depreciation on intellectual property rights for 2007-08 was overturned due to evidence. The disallowance for 2008-09 was upheld as license renewal proof was lacking. Disallowance of unsecured loan was deleted as ledger entry proved loan receipt. Disallowance of loan amount credited to account was deleted based on provided evidence. Disallowance under section 43B was dismissed. The appeal for 2007-08 was allowed, while for 2008-09, it was partly allowed due to lack of renewal evidence. The Tribunal made decisions based on presented evidence and lower authorities&#039; findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>