<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 667 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422407</link>
    <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reconsider the deduction claimed under Section 80C and deleting the additions made towards cash deposits in the bank account. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s explanations and supporting evidence, particularly in cases involving presumptive taxation under Section 44AD.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 08:38:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 667 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422407</link>
      <description>The tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the AO to reconsider the deduction claimed under Section 80C and deleting the additions made towards cash deposits in the bank account. The tribunal emphasized the importance of considering the assessee&#039;s explanations and supporting evidence, particularly in cases involving presumptive taxation under Section 44AD.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422407</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>