<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Finds Related Party Transaction Plausible; No Ill-Intent Proven Under Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63452</link>
    <description>Related party transaction - Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements - The view, as taken by the Appellate Tribunal, in the given set of facts and circumstances of the present case, appears to be a plausible view of the matter. In fact, nothing of ill-intent on the part of the respondents has been established in the present case. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 08:38:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 21:49:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Finds Related Party Transaction Plausible; No Ill-Intent Proven Under Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63452</link>
      <description>Related party transaction - Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements - The view, as taken by the Appellate Tribunal, in the given set of facts and circumstances of the present case, appears to be a plausible view of the matter. In fact, nothing of ill-intent on the part of the respondents has been established in the present case. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 08:38:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63452</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>