<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 651 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422391</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the amount paid by the appellant under a mistaken notion of liability. It held that the service tax paid was not a liability and therefore not subject to the limitations of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal criticized the adjudicating authorities for not following established judicial precedents and emphasized the importance of adhering to higher court rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2023 14:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 651 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422391</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the refund of the amount paid by the appellant under a mistaken notion of liability. It held that the service tax paid was not a liability and therefore not subject to the limitations of Section 11B of the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal criticized the adjudicating authorities for not following established judicial precedents and emphasized the importance of adhering to higher court rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>