https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422389 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed both appeals in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Member (Judicial) found that the demand was confirmed in a mechanical manner without sufficient evidence or corroborative evidence. Relying on precedent decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted consequential benefits to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiated evidence and proper examination of witnesses in confirming demands related to clandestine activities to ensure fair adjudication and uphold legal standards. en-us Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 May 2022 08:37:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422389 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT New Delhi allowed both appeals in a case involving alleged clandestine removal of goods. The Member (Judicial) found that the demand was confirmed in a mechanical manner without sufficient evidence or corroborative evidence. Relying on precedent decisions, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and granted consequential benefits to the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of substantiated evidence and proper examination of witnesses in confirming demands related to clandestine activities to ensure fair adjudication and uphold legal standards. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 13 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422389