https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422388 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods, demand of excise duty based on third-party records, confiscation of cash under Section 121 of the Customs Act, and demand of duty on the basis of undervaluation of goods. The tribunal found that the demands of duty, interest, and penalties were unsustainable due to insufficient corroborative evidence and the denial of cross-examination opportunities. As a result, all appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs in accordance with the law. en-us Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2022 14:11:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422388 The tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants in a case involving allegations of clandestine removal of excisable goods, demand of excise duty based on third-party records, confiscation of cash under Section 121 of the Customs Act, and demand of duty on the basis of undervaluation of goods. The tribunal found that the demands of duty, interest, and penalties were unsustainable due to insufficient corroborative evidence and the denial of cross-examination opportunities. As a result, all appeals were allowed with consequential reliefs in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422388