<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 644 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422384</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. 50866 of 2021 due to a calculation error, reducing the appellant&#039;s liability to Rs. 1,01,705.70 instead of Rs. 10,39,750/-. Appeal No. 50867 of 2021 was dismissed as no calculation error was found, and the excess duty paid was appropriately adjusted. The Tribunal held that technical grounds raised were not sustainable to set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ultimately upholding the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 May 2022 08:37:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679107" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 644 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422384</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed Appeal No. 50866 of 2021 due to a calculation error, reducing the appellant&#039;s liability to Rs. 1,01,705.70 instead of Rs. 10,39,750/-. Appeal No. 50867 of 2021 was dismissed as no calculation error was found, and the excess duty paid was appropriately adjusted. The Tribunal held that technical grounds raised were not sustainable to set aside the Order-in-Appeal, ultimately upholding the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>