<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1969 (8) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302285</link>
    <description>Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act has wide scope and enlarges a Hindu female&#039;s pre-existing property rights into full ownership, including property acquired and later allotted on partition. Section 14(2) is a narrow exception and applies only where property is acquired for the first time under an instrument, decree, order or award that itself creates a restricted estate. A Hindu widow who already had a share and right to partition under the Hindu Women&#039;s Right to Property Act, 1937, and later received specific allotment by award and decree, was not taking a fresh restricted grant. Her limited estate therefore became absolute ownership, and Section 14(2) did not apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 16:58:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679076" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1969 (8) TMI 98 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302285</link>
      <description>Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act has wide scope and enlarges a Hindu female&#039;s pre-existing property rights into full ownership, including property acquired and later allotted on partition. Section 14(2) is a narrow exception and applies only where property is acquired for the first time under an instrument, decree, order or award that itself creates a restricted estate. A Hindu widow who already had a share and right to partition under the Hindu Women&#039;s Right to Property Act, 1937, and later received specific allotment by award and decree, was not taking a fresh restricted grant. Her limited estate therefore became absolute ownership, and Section 14(2) did not apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 1969 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302285</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>