<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1971 (1) TMI 128 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302284</link>
    <description>A widow who took property under a genuine testamentary disposition was confined to the limited estate created by that will. Her possession remained referable to the will, not to any independent heirship right, and the limited estate could not enlarge into an absolute estate under the Hindu Succession Act without a legal basis for enlargement. The widow therefore held only a life estate, and no absolute title could pass through her subsequent will in favour of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 16:19:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679073" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1971 (1) TMI 128 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302284</link>
      <description>A widow who took property under a genuine testamentary disposition was confined to the limited estate created by that will. Her possession remained referable to the will, not to any independent heirship right, and the limited estate could not enlarge into an absolute estate under the Hindu Succession Act without a legal basis for enlargement. The widow therefore held only a life estate, and no absolute title could pass through her subsequent will in favour of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 1971 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>