<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Section 68 Addition Deleted: Partner&#039;s Capital Not Taxable Due to Filing Error by Firm, Says CIT(A.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63438</link>
    <description>Addition u/s 68 on unexplained capital - erroneous filing of ITR and is a result of mistake committed by the assessee partnership firm - the capital introduced by the partners cannot be taxed in the hands of the assessee-firm under section 68 - we are of the considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has fully justified in deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Act. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 11:03:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 11:03:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679053" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Section 68 Addition Deleted: Partner&#039;s Capital Not Taxable Due to Filing Error by Firm, Says CIT(A.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63438</link>
      <description>Addition u/s 68 on unexplained capital - erroneous filing of ITR and is a result of mistake committed by the assessee partnership firm - the capital introduced by the partners cannot be taxed in the hands of the assessee-firm under section 68 - we are of the considered opinion that the ld. CIT(A) has fully justified in deleting the addition made under section 68 of the Act. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 11:03:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=63438</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>