<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1927 (2) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302276</link>
    <description>A final adjudication by a revenue court on title, made within jurisdiction under tenancy proceedings, can operate as res judicata in a later civil suit. An order of a partition court under the Land Revenue Act may also have the same effect where it amounts to a conclusive determination of title in favour of the auction-purchaser. Possession by co-sharers or lambardars, including receipt of rent, is not adverse unless it is shown to be hostile to the other co-sharers. The auction-sale was treated as carrying the appurtenant interest in the shamlat patti along with the principal pattis. The suit was dismissed and the trial court&#039;s decree was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 10:29:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679046" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1927 (2) TMI 18 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302276</link>
      <description>A final adjudication by a revenue court on title, made within jurisdiction under tenancy proceedings, can operate as res judicata in a later civil suit. An order of a partition court under the Land Revenue Act may also have the same effect where it amounts to a conclusive determination of title in favour of the auction-purchaser. Possession by co-sharers or lambardars, including receipt of rent, is not adverse unless it is shown to be hostile to the other co-sharers. The auction-sale was treated as carrying the appurtenant interest in the shamlat patti along with the principal pattis. The suit was dismissed and the trial court&#039;s decree was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 1927 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>