<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 623 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422363</link>
    <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14 was dismissed. The penalty was upheld as the appellant failed to rebut the findings of the Assessing Officer regarding inaccurate particulars furnished, involving a scheme of bogus donations and false certificates. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the penalty initiation and no inaccurate particulars were refuted, leading to the sustained penalty imposition based on legal decisions and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 07:52:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679022" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 623 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422363</link>
      <description>The appeal against the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income-tax Act for the assessment year 2013-14 was dismissed. The penalty was upheld as the appellant failed to rebut the findings of the Assessing Officer regarding inaccurate particulars furnished, involving a scheme of bogus donations and false certificates. The appellant&#039;s arguments regarding the penalty initiation and no inaccurate particulars were refuted, leading to the sustained penalty imposition based on legal decisions and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>