<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422356</link>
    <description>Processing under section 143(1) requires compliance with the limited adjustment regime and a reasoned disposal of objections, because rejection of assessee objections is a quasi-judicial function. A standard template order without specific reasons is inadequate. A tax audit report is only an independent professional report and does not, by itself, bind the assessee or override binding jurisdictional High Court law. On the facts, delayed employees&#039; provident fund and ESIC payments reported in the audit report did not justify disallowance under section 143(1)(a)(iv) where the jurisdictional law treated such payments as deductible if made before the return-filing due date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=679015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 616 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422356</link>
      <description>Processing under section 143(1) requires compliance with the limited adjustment regime and a reasoned disposal of objections, because rejection of assessee objections is a quasi-judicial function. A standard template order without specific reasons is inadequate. A tax audit report is only an independent professional report and does not, by itself, bind the assessee or override binding jurisdictional High Court law. On the facts, delayed employees&#039; provident fund and ESIC payments reported in the audit report did not justify disallowance under section 143(1)(a)(iv) where the jurisdictional law treated such payments as deductible if made before the return-filing due date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>