https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28904 The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the cross-objection. It clarified that the right to file a cross-objection is separate from the right to appeal, allowing parties to challenge issues not raised in the original appeal. The Court highlighted the importance of adjudicating cross-objections on their merits, particularly in this case concerning the allowance of Rs. 7,500 for a campaign against nationalization of general insurance. en-us Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28904 The Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, emphasizing that the Tribunal erred in dismissing the cross-objection. It clarified that the right to file a cross-objection is separate from the right to appeal, allowing parties to challenge issues not raised in the original appeal. The Court highlighted the importance of adjudicating cross-objections on their merits, particularly in this case concerning the allowance of Rs. 7,500 for a campaign against nationalization of general insurance. Case-Laws Income Tax Thu, 11 Feb 1982 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28904