https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422331 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer and exporter seeking a refund of IGST against two shipping bills. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to the IGST refund under the relevant provisions of the IGST Act and CGST Act, despite a dispute over duty drawback codes and the interpretation of a CBIC circular. The court directed the respondent to refund the IGST amounts claimed by the petitioner and ordered the payment of interest at a rate of 7% per annum from the date of correction due to the delay in granting the refund. en-us Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Oct 2022 14:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422331 The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a manufacturer and exporter seeking a refund of IGST against two shipping bills. The court held that the petitioner was entitled to the IGST refund under the relevant provisions of the IGST Act and CGST Act, despite a dispute over duty drawback codes and the interpretation of a CBIC circular. The court directed the respondent to refund the IGST amounts claimed by the petitioner and ordered the payment of interest at a rate of 7% per annum from the date of correction due to the delay in granting the refund. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 04 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422331