https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422329 The High Court declined to entertain the Writ Petitions, emphasizing the rule of alternate remedy and the need for exceptional circumstances to invoke writ jurisdiction. As the petitioner had already pursued remedies before the 1st Appellate Authority with a further remedy available via Second Appeal, and no breach of fundamental rights or excess of jurisdiction was demonstrated, the Court disposed of the petitions. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the alternate remedy while preserving the right to raise all contentions on merits in the future. en-us Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2022 07:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422329 The High Court declined to entertain the Writ Petitions, emphasizing the rule of alternate remedy and the need for exceptional circumstances to invoke writ jurisdiction. As the petitioner had already pursued remedies before the 1st Appellate Authority with a further remedy available via Second Appeal, and no breach of fundamental rights or excess of jurisdiction was demonstrated, the Court disposed of the petitions. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue the alternate remedy while preserving the right to raise all contentions on merits in the future. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 25 Mar 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422329