<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422327</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, holding that the refund of the excess amount paid must be granted. It emphasized that the Department cannot retain amounts collected beyond what is legally permissible. The decision reaffirmed that taxpayers are entitled to refunds of excess payments made under mistake, irrespective of statutory limitation periods typically applicable to refund claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 07:50:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 587 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422327</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals, holding that the refund of the excess amount paid must be granted. It emphasized that the Department cannot retain amounts collected beyond what is legally permissible. The decision reaffirmed that taxpayers are entitled to refunds of excess payments made under mistake, irrespective of statutory limitation periods typically applicable to refund claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>