<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 571 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422311</link>
    <description>Delay and laches defeated the challenge to the Sabka Vishwas Scheme determination, as the petitioner failed to act promptly after being informed of the estimated arrears liability and also did not approach the Court within the scheme period. The Bombay HC found no bona fides in the belated request for interference and treated the unexplained inaction as fatal to relief. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the challenge to the scheme determination failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 07:49:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 571 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422311</link>
      <description>Delay and laches defeated the challenge to the Sabka Vishwas Scheme determination, as the petitioner failed to act promptly after being informed of the estimated arrears liability and also did not approach the Court within the scheme period. The Bombay HC found no bona fides in the belated request for interference and treated the unexplained inaction as fatal to relief. The writ petition was therefore not entertained, and the challenge to the scheme determination failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>