<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 566 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422306</link>
    <description>Blending two oils by an electric process, which reduced viscosity and produced a commercially distinct product sold under a different name and brand, amounted to manufacture because the activity transformed the inputs into a new, marketable excisable goods. The demand was also found to be within limitation on the facts. The High Court upheld the authorities&#039; orders and held the assessee liable to excise duty on the finished product.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2022 16:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678960" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 566 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422306</link>
      <description>Blending two oils by an electric process, which reduced viscosity and produced a commercially distinct product sold under a different name and brand, amounted to manufacture because the activity transformed the inputs into a new, marketable excisable goods. The demand was also found to be within limitation on the facts. The High Court upheld the authorities&#039; orders and held the assessee liable to excise duty on the finished product.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>