https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422301 The appeal was allowed, and the court directed the original adjudicating authority to permit cross-examination of key witnesses, including Mr. Narendra Mishra. A de novo adjudication process was ordered to be completed within four months, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision highlighted the significance of following the prescribed procedure to uphold fairness and legality in adjudication proceedings. en-us Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 01 Nov 2022 12:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422301 The appeal was allowed, and the court directed the original adjudicating authority to permit cross-examination of key witnesses, including Mr. Narendra Mishra. A de novo adjudication process was ordered to be completed within four months, emphasizing adherence to procedural requirements under Section 9D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The decision highlighted the significance of following the prescribed procedure to uphold fairness and legality in adjudication proceedings. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 08 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422301