<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422297</link>
    <description>Penalty under Section 15-A(1)(O) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held unsustainable where goods were supported by bills, bilti and books of account, and the only lapse was non-production of Form-31 at interception, later filed. The record showed no discrepancy in movement or dispatch and no material indicating an intention to evade tax. Applying the settled principle that mere absence of Form-31, without proved mens rea to evade tax, does not justify penalty, the penalty was quashed and the assessee succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 10:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678945" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 557 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422297</link>
      <description>Penalty under Section 15-A(1)(O) of the U.P. Trade Tax Act was held unsustainable where goods were supported by bills, bilti and books of account, and the only lapse was non-production of Form-31 at interception, later filed. The record showed no discrepancy in movement or dispatch and no material indicating an intention to evade tax. Applying the settled principle that mere absence of Form-31, without proved mens rea to evade tax, does not justify penalty, the penalty was quashed and the assessee succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422297</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>