https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302273 Section 311 CrPC gives the court wide discretion to summon, examine, recall or re-examine evidence at any stage where it is essential to a just decision, but the power must be exercised judiciously for strong and valid reasons to prevent miscarriage of justice. The trial court had recorded cogent reasons for allowing witnesses and documents to be summoned, including the relevance of the second post-mortem, the investigating officer's correspondence, and the need to place material evidence on record. Interference under Section 482 CrPC was therefore unwarranted, and the order quashing the trial court's decision was unsustainable. en-us Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 May 2022 07:48:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302273 Section 311 CrPC gives the court wide discretion to summon, examine, recall or re-examine evidence at any stage where it is essential to a just decision, but the power must be exercised judiciously for strong and valid reasons to prevent miscarriage of justice. The trial court had recorded cogent reasons for allowing witnesses and documents to be summoned, including the relevance of the second post-mortem, the investigating officer's correspondence, and the need to place material evidence on record. Interference under Section 482 CrPC was therefore unwarranted, and the order quashing the trial court's decision was unsustainable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302273