<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (4) TMI 15 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28897</link>
    <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the proviso to section 5(1A) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, holding that the maximum deduction allowable under section 5(1A) would be the value of assets under specific clauses if it exceeded Rs. 1.5 lakhs. The court confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, providing clarity on the permissible deduction limits under the Act. The legality of the order passed under section 35 was not extensively discussed in the judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 15:00:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67894" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (4) TMI 15 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28897</link>
      <description>The court affirmed the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of the proviso to section 5(1A) of the Wealth-tax Act, 1957, holding that the maximum deduction allowable under section 5(1A) would be the value of assets under specific clauses if it exceeded Rs. 1.5 lakhs. The court confirmed the Tribunal&#039;s decision, providing clarity on the permissible deduction limits under the Act. The legality of the order passed under section 35 was not extensively discussed in the judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Wealth-tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28897</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>