<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1381 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302274</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a government company for non-payment of service benefits. It found that the claimed amount did not qualify as &quot;Operational Debt&quot; under the insolvency code, as service benefits were not essential for the company&#039;s continuity. The petitioner had alternative remedies available, including enforcing an order from the gratuity commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s rejection of the gratuity amount offered by the Corporate Debtor in a previous writ petition was considered his own fault, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2022 07:48:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678938" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1381 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302274</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Company Petition seeking Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a government company for non-payment of service benefits. It found that the claimed amount did not qualify as &quot;Operational Debt&quot; under the insolvency code, as service benefits were not essential for the company&#039;s continuity. The petitioner had alternative remedies available, including enforcing an order from the gratuity commissioner. The Tribunal emphasized that the petitioner&#039;s rejection of the gratuity amount offered by the Corporate Debtor in a previous writ petition was considered his own fault, leading to the dismissal of the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302274</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>