<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (2) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28895</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled against the Department regarding the deduction of bad debt during insolvency proceedings, stating that the debt could not be considered bad until a final dividend was declared. However, the court sided with the assessee on the allowability of messing expenses as business expenditure, affirming that such expenses were admissible under prevailing practices for adhatiyas.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:23:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67892" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (2) TMI 10 - MADHYA PRADESH High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28895</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled against the Department regarding the deduction of bad debt during insolvency proceedings, stating that the debt could not be considered bad until a final dividend was declared. However, the court sided with the assessee on the allowability of messing expenses as business expenditure, affirming that such expenses were admissible under prevailing practices for adhatiyas.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28895</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>