<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>NOTIONAL RENT OF HOUSE PROPERTY HELD AS STOCK-IN-TRADE IS NOT TAXABLE UNDER HEAD ‘income from house property’ – discussion in view of recent and some earlier judgments. This will not be taxable even in view of clause (5) in section 23 w.e.f. 01.04.2018- a point of view</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10397</link>
    <description>Notional rental income of house property held as stock-in-trade should not be taxable under Income from House Property because such property is occupied for business purposes and income from it is chargeable as business income. Although an amendment deems annual value nil for a limited post-construction period, once that period ends annual value would otherwise be determined; the author argues this creates inconsistency with the business-occupation exclusion and with accounting for real income, and that practical deductions for vacancy or unrealizable rent will neutralize any notional inclusion.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 17:37:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 17:37:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>NOTIONAL RENT OF HOUSE PROPERTY HELD AS STOCK-IN-TRADE IS NOT TAXABLE UNDER HEAD ‘income from house property’ – discussion in view of recent and some earlier judgments. This will not be taxable even in view of clause (5) in section 23 w.e.f. 01.04.2018- a point of view</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10397</link>
      <description>Notional rental income of house property held as stock-in-trade should not be taxable under Income from House Property because such property is occupied for business purposes and income from it is chargeable as business income. Although an amendment deems annual value nil for a limited post-construction period, once that period ends annual value would otherwise be determined; the author argues this creates inconsistency with the business-occupation exclusion and with accounting for real income, and that practical deductions for vacancy or unrealizable rent will neutralize any notional inclusion.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 17:37:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=10397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>