<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1981 (9) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28893</link>
    <description>The sum paid by a firm to a retired partner was excluded from the total income of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the right to share in profits was assignable, and the retired partner had transferred this right to his sons. As the income accrued after retirement and was assigned before it accrued to the assessee, it was deemed not assessable as his income. The High Court upheld this decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the Revenue to cover the reference costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 14:18:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=67890" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1981 (9) TMI 14 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28893</link>
      <description>The sum paid by a firm to a retired partner was excluded from the total income of the assessee. The Tribunal held that the right to share in profits was assignable, and the retired partner had transferred this right to his sons. As the income accrued after retirement and was assigned before it accrued to the assessee, it was deemed not assessable as his income. The High Court upheld this decision, ruling in favor of the assessee and directing the Revenue to cover the reference costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 1981 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=28893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>