https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422287 The HC directed the petitioner, a transporter challenging detention of hosiery garments under GST Acts, to file an appeal against the impugned order dated 17.03.2022 rather than pursuing a writ petition. The court noted that the petitioner had not exhausted available appeal remedies under the TNGST Act, 2017. Without examining the merits regarding valuation disputes or alleged failure to consider objections, the court instructed the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within one month of filing, ensuring all parties receive a fair hearing. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. en-us Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 11:32:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422287 The HC directed the petitioner, a transporter challenging detention of hosiery garments under GST Acts, to file an appeal against the impugned order dated 17.03.2022 rather than pursuing a writ petition. The court noted that the petitioner had not exhausted available appeal remedies under the TNGST Act, 2017. Without examining the merits regarding valuation disputes or alleged failure to consider objections, the court instructed the appellate authority to dispose of the appeal within one month of filing, ensuring all parties receive a fair hearing. The writ petition was disposed of with these directions. Case-Laws GST Thu, 05 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422287