https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422272 The HC heard a writ petition regarding refund of GST amounts deposited by DMRC on behalf of the petitioner. The dispute arose from a land lease agreement where the actual land provided was less than contracted. While DMRC returned excess premium, the tax amount remained with revenue authorities. The petitioner argued no taxable supply occurred for the unused land portion. The court ordered DMRC to be added as respondent no.3 since they were integral to the dispute. The petitioner was directed to file amended documents within a week, and notices were issued to all parties. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 03.08.2022. en-us Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 03 Apr 2025 13:21:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422272 The HC heard a writ petition regarding refund of GST amounts deposited by DMRC on behalf of the petitioner. The dispute arose from a land lease agreement where the actual land provided was less than contracted. While DMRC returned excess premium, the tax amount remained with revenue authorities. The petitioner argued no taxable supply occurred for the unused land portion. The court ordered DMRC to be added as respondent no.3 since they were integral to the dispute. The petitioner was directed to file amended documents within a week, and notices were issued to all parties. The case was scheduled for further hearing on 03.08.2022. Case-Laws GST Fri, 22 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422272