<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422269</link>
    <description>The court held that the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act were beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 149 and did not meet the exceptions under Section 150. The Tribunal&#039;s observations did not constitute a finding or direction necessary for reopening under Section 150. As there was no failure to disclose material facts, the court quashed the notices and the order on objections, allowing and disposing of all writ petitions accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2022 18:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 529 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422269</link>
      <description>The court held that the notices issued under Section 148 of the Income-Tax Act were beyond the limitation period prescribed under Section 149 and did not meet the exceptions under Section 150. The Tribunal&#039;s observations did not constitute a finding or direction necessary for reopening under Section 150. As there was no failure to disclose material facts, the court quashed the notices and the order on objections, allowing and disposing of all writ petitions accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422269</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>