<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 501 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422241</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s findings lacked specific evidence and were based on presumptions, noting that the assessee had provided necessary documents supporting the genuineness of the transactions. Consequently, the Tribunal also deleted the consequential addition related to commission on the alleged accommodation entry.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 08:44:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 501 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422241</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the assessee, directing the Assessing Officer to delete the addition made under section 68 of the Income-tax Act. The Tribunal found that the AO&#039;s findings lacked specific evidence and were based on presumptions, noting that the assessee had provided necessary documents supporting the genuineness of the transactions. Consequently, the Tribunal also deleted the consequential addition related to commission on the alleged accommodation entry.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>