<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422236</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant. The Tribunal determined that the royalty/license fee paid was not a condition of sale and should not be included in the assessable value of the imported goods. Furthermore, miscellaneous charges, already included in the Bill of Entry under a different column, were not required to be added again to the assessable value.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2023 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 496 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422236</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the Tribunal, setting aside the impugned order and granting consequential relief to the appellant. The Tribunal determined that the royalty/license fee paid was not a condition of sale and should not be included in the assessable value of the imported goods. Furthermore, miscellaneous charges, already included in the Bill of Entry under a different column, were not required to be added again to the assessable value.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>