<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 494 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422234</link>
    <description>The tribunal concluded that the claims in the Section 9 application were barred by limitation and that there was a pre-existing dispute between the parties. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15/02/2022 was set aside, and both appeals were allowed. The amount deposited by the appellant in compliance with the tribunal&#039;s order dated 22/02/2022 was ordered to be refunded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 08:43:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678825" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 494 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422234</link>
      <description>The tribunal concluded that the claims in the Section 9 application were barred by limitation and that there was a pre-existing dispute between the parties. Consequently, the impugned order dated 15/02/2022 was set aside, and both appeals were allowed. The amount deposited by the appellant in compliance with the tribunal&#039;s order dated 22/02/2022 was ordered to be refunded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>