https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422217 The court dismissed the writ application on grounds of maintainability, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 35 B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of following statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, citing the need to meet exceptions such as violations of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenges to legislation for writs to be entertained. en-us Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2022 08:42:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422217 The court dismissed the writ application on grounds of maintainability, directing the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy of appeal under Section 35 B of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The court emphasized the importance of following statutory remedies before resorting to writ jurisdiction, citing the need to meet exceptions such as violations of natural justice, lack of jurisdiction, or challenges to legislation for writs to be entertained. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422217