https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422211 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the impugned orders under the DVAT Act, 2004 were without jurisdiction. The court directed the respondent to release the refund claimed for the second quarter of FY 2016-2017 along with interest. Additionally, the court quashed the assessment orders under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the same period and instructed the respondent to process the refund application promptly. en-us Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2022 08:42:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422211 The High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, holding that the impugned orders under the DVAT Act, 2004 were without jurisdiction. The court directed the respondent to release the refund claimed for the second quarter of FY 2016-2017 along with interest. Additionally, the court quashed the assessment orders under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the same period and instructed the respondent to process the refund application promptly. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 06 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422211