<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (5) TMI 467 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422207</link>
    <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a demand notice marked in evidence without objection was treated as duly proved, because an objection to the mode of proof must be raised when the document is tendered and the surrounding postal records supported service. The evidence also showed that the cheque was issued towards an existing liability, dishonoured for insufficiency of funds or arrangement, and that no payment was made after statutory notice or summons. The statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not rebutted, and the record was held sufficient to establish liability of the company and its directors.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 08:42:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=678791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (5) TMI 467 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422207</link>
      <description>In a cheque dishonour prosecution, a demand notice marked in evidence without objection was treated as duly proved, because an objection to the mode of proof must be raised when the document is tendered and the surrounding postal records supported service. The evidence also showed that the cheque was issued towards an existing liability, dishonoured for insufficiency of funds or arrangement, and that no payment was made after statutory notice or summons. The statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act was not rebutted, and the record was held sufficient to establish liability of the company and its directors.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=422207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>