https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302255 The HC held that quashing was unwarranted where the prosecution material, taken at face value, disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed and raised a strong suspicion of the alleged offences. It found that the allegations were not limited to the petitioner's status as a public servant's spouse, but included alleged participation in asset acquisition, impersonation connected with property allotment, and other incriminating material gathered in investigation. At the charge stage, the court need not conduct a mini trial or weigh defence material. The substantial progress of the trial also weighed against interference, and the charges and consequential proceedings were upheld. en-us Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 12 May 2022 08:41:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302255 The HC held that quashing was unwarranted where the prosecution material, taken at face value, disclosed sufficient grounds to proceed and raised a strong suspicion of the alleged offences. It found that the allegations were not limited to the petitioner's status as a public servant's spouse, but included alleged participation in asset acquisition, impersonation connected with property allotment, and other incriminating material gathered in investigation. At the charge stage, the court need not conduct a mini trial or weigh defence material. The substantial progress of the trial also weighed against interference, and the charges and consequential proceedings were upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 05 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=302255